Dear Editor,
I am compelled to respond to Peeping Tom’s recent article, “The business class also funds undemocratic parties,” published on November 25, 2024. The piece criticizes the business community for supporting the People’s National Congress Islahat (PNCR), suggesting that such backing undermines democracy. This perspective not only misrepresents the rights of businesses but also overlooks the troubling history of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), which raises serious concerns about the implications of supporting them.
In a democratic society, every individual and entity, including businesses, has the inherent right to support any political party. This support can manifest through financial contributions, public endorsements, or active participation. To label such actions as “financing democratic backsliding” is misleading and undermines the very principles of democracy that allow for diverse political expression.
The article’s portrayal of the PNCR as a party with a “tumultuous” relationship with democracy is a subjective assessment that disregards the party’s legitimate role in Guyana’s political landscape. The PNCR, like any political entity, has its history and challenges, but it also represents a significant portion of the Guyanese populace. To suggest that supporting the PNCR equates to endorsing undemocratic practices is an oversimplification that disrespects the choices of many citizens and businesses.
Moreover, the insinuation that the business class’s support for the PNCR is driven by selfish motives or a desire to undermine democracy is both unfounded and offensive. Businesses, by their nature, seek stability, growth, and a conducive environment for operations. Their support for political parties is often aligned with policies that they believe will foster economic development and societal progress. It is not the place of commentators to question the integrity of these decisions without substantive evidence.
Conversely, the PPP’s track record raises significant concerns that should give any potential supporter pause. The party has been associated with;
- Extrajudicial Killings
Reports have documented instances where state security forces engaged in unlawful killings during the PPP’s tenure. - Massive Corruption
Allegations of widespread corruption have plagued the PPP, with numerous reports highlighting financial mismanagement and lack of accountability. - Racial Discrimination
The PPP has faced criticism for policies perceived as favoring certain ethnic groups over others, leading to societal divisions. - Money Laundering
International bodies have raised concerns about inadequate measures to combat money laundering under the PPP’s administration. - Sexual Abuse
There have been troubling reports of sexual misconduct involving party officials, raising questions about the party’s commitment to addressing such issues. - Creeping Authoritarianism
The PPP’s governance style has been criticized for undermining democratic institutions and processes, leading to fears of an authoritarian drift.
Given this concerning history, it is perplexing that the article singles out the PNCR while ignoring the PPP’s documented transgressions. The business community, like all citizens, should be free to support any political party without fear of vilification or boycott. Encouraging a culture of respect for diverse political opinions is crucial for the health of our democracy. Instead of casting aspersions on the motives of businesses, we should celebrate their active participation in the political process, which contributes to a vibrant and dynamic society.
Sincerely,
Paul Samuels