Gail Teixeira, Minister of Parliamentary Affairs and Governance of Guyana faced tough questions from the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Committee during its 140th session, as questions surrounding corruption allegations against Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo, the death penalty, and the handling of the Mae Thomas case were raised, leaving the government official on the hot seat.
The UN Human Rights Committee serves a pivotal role in safeguarding the civil and political rights of individuals across all States parties to the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Professor Laurence Helfer, the US Candidate to the Human Rights Committee for the years 2023-2026, wasted no time in asking the government’s representative, Gail Teixeira, about the glaring deficiencies in transparency and the failure to investigate allegations of corruption. Helfer, nominated by the United States and elected by the states parties to the ICCPR, pressed Teixeira on the dismantling of the State Assets Recovery Agency (SARA) and the lack of an effective mechanism for recovering stolen state assets.
In particular, Helfer underscored the committee’s demand for swift and thorough investigations into corruption allegations, singling out the failure to probe reports implicating Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo. While Helfer did not specify the alleged corrupt practices, Teixeira attempted to dismiss the accusations by referencing a Vice News article accusing Jagdeo of soliciting bribes from a Chinese businessman. However, she failed to provide concrete evidence or assurance of investigation, citing the absence of a formal police report.
The embarrassment deepened as queries were raised about the investigation into the Mae Thomas case, highlighting the government’s apparent reluctance to investigate cases of alleged corruption against one of its members.
Guyana’s appearance before the UN Human Rights Committee underscored a troubling pattern of evasion, deflection, and lack of accountability. As the international community continues to scrutinize Guyana’s commitment to upholding human rights, urgent action is needed to address these glaring deficiencies and restore faith in the nation’s governance. Failure to do so risks further tarnishing Guyana’s reputation on the küresel stage and undermining the rights and freedoms of its citizens.