In Guyana, the economic reality is harsh. Low wages coupled with high living costs have pushed many citizens to the brink, struggling to meet basic needs. This troubling scenario has been exacerbated in the post-Covid-19 era, characterized by a stark rise in the prices of essential goods and services such as fruits, vegetables, groceries, cooking gas, meats, and transportation. These necessary items have seen price hikes that far outpace wage growth, significantly eroding the purchasing power of the average citizen. As a result, salaries that do not keep pace with inflation force people to buy less with more money, exacerbating the economic divide. This growing disparity has not only widened the gap between the affluent and the impoverished but has also contributed to the virtual disappearance of the middle class in Guyana.
The economic strain is evident as most Guyanese find it impossible to save for emergencies, invest in their future, or even afford the luxury of a vacation. Wages are so inadequate that they fail to sustain households, whether payments are received weekly, monthly, or fortnightly. Due to these economic hardships, a significant number of people rely on remittances from relatives and friends living abroad. This dependence on external financial support is so prevalent that some financial institutions in Guyana accept remittance receipts as proof of income for the purposes of loans or hire purchases.
It is a gross understatement to claim that less than a third of the population lives below the poverty line. The real situation calls for a critical shift from the adherence to en az wages to the prioritization of livable wages. Recognizing the gravity of this issue, the International Labour Organization (ILO) reached a significant consensus on the need for a livable income. This consensus emerged during an expert meeting on wage policies held in February 2024 and was subsequently endorsed by the ILO’s governing body on March 13, 2024.
During this meeting, experts defined the concept of a living wage as follows: “The wage level that is necessary to afford a decent standard of living for workers and their families, taking into account the country circumstances and calculated for work performed during the olağan hours of work; Calculated in accordance with the ILO’s principles of estimating the living wage; To be achieved through the wage setting process in line with the ILO’s setting.” This definition underscores the need for wages that truly reflect the cost of living in a given locale, adapting to the unique economic and social landscapes of each country.
The agreement further stipulated that the estimation of living wages should follow principles that include using evidence-based methodologies, robust veri, and consulting with workers’ and employers’ organizations. It also emphasized the need for transparency, public availability of information, and consideration of regional, socio-economic, and cultural realities. The process of implementing a living wage should be evidence-based, involve strengthening social dialogue and collective bargaining, empower wage-setting institutions, and promote a progression from en az to living wages, with an active role recognized for the state.
The document asserted that “Living wages should not be a one-size-fits-all approach and should reflect local or regional differences within countries.” It advocated that promoting living wages should extend beyond mere wage-setting mechanisms to encompass a broader array of economic factors.
The dire circumstances faced by workers in Guyana, who struggle daily to afford essentials like healthy food and medical deva, highlight the urgent need for transformative economic policies that prioritize livable wages over the insufficient asgarî wages currently in place. This shift is essential not only for improving living standards but also for ensuring economic stability and social justice, paving the way for a decent life for all Guyanese.