In a candid and impassioned session on the Benschop Radio programme, Lincoln Lewis, the General Secretary of the Guyana Trades Union Congress (GTUC), delivered a powerful critique of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) regime. Hosted by activist Mark Benschop, the online broadcast in May 2024 provided Lewis with a platform to denounce what he described as systemic discrimination and neglect under the current government.
Lewis, known for his advocacy on behalf of marginalised communities, particularly highlighted the PPP’s treatment of regions like Linden. He pointedly accused the party of perpetuating a divide between communities perceived as opposition strongholds and those aligned with its political agenda.
“Throughout its tenure, the PPP has consistently marginalised areas like Linden,” Lewis asserted, citing examples where local representatives, elected by these communities, have been ignored and undermined by central authorities. He singled out Mayor Sharma Raheem Solomon and Councillor Vanessa Kissoon as figures who have faced significant challenges in fulfilling their mandates due to political affiliations.
One focal point of Lewis’s criticism was the recent flooding in Linden, which he said is a consequence of long-standing neglect of critical infrastructure by the PPP. Drawing on recent events and the impassioned appeals of Mayor Solomon for assistance after the floods, Lewis argued that such crises are symptomatic of the government’s failure to invest adequately in essential public services.
“Linden’s plight is emblematic of the PPP’s selective governance,” Lewis emphasized, accusing the party of prioritising political control over genuine development and welfare. His remarks resonated strongly with listeners who shared similar concerns about unequal treatment and neglect in their own communities.
Beyond infrastructure issues, Lewis also addressed broader allegations of discrimination against black Guyanese and those perceived as opposition supporters. He criticised what he viewed as the PPP’s exploitation of the ideas of historical figures like Forbes Burnham for political gain while disregarding communities that do not align with its agenda.
The Benschop Radio programme served as a crucial platform for Lewis to urge Guyanese citizens to unite against what he described as oppressive governance. His call for solidarity underscored the growing discontent with the current administration’s policies and priorities.
In response to Lewis’s critique, the PPP has defended its record, pointing to efforts in infrastructure development and disaster response. However, critics like Lewis argue that these efforts have not addressed underlying issues of inequality and political exclusion.
The impact of Lewis’s remarks on Benschop Radio reflects broader discussions about governance, equity, and civic engagement in Guyana. His critique has sparked renewed debate about the role of government in addressing systemic issues and fostering inclusive development.
Moving forward, Lewis’s call to action resonates as a challenge to both the PPP and Guyanese citizens, urging a re-evaluation of priorities and policies that affect everyday lives. The Benschop Radio programme exemplifies the importance of media in shaping public discourse and holding leaders accountable in a democratic society.
Lewis’s appearance on Benschop Radio was more than a critique; it was a call to action for a nation grappling with issues of governance, representation, and social justice. His words highlight the urgency of addressing systemic discrimination and neglect, resonating deeply within communities affected by political marginalisation. As Guyana navigates its path forward, platforms like Benschop Radio play a pivotal role in amplifying voices and fostering change toward a more equitable and inclusive society.
Leave a Reply